I hated activating phones cause it was a hassle since we were not connected directly with carriers. Activation will take longer than usual and they can mess up your account/credit. Personally, Apple should have increased the screen size and then increased the resolution.I used to work at radioshack too and the resources there suck. There's a huge difference between a 4" and a 3.5". So a 50" SD tv is better than a 42" High Def tv?
There are much better smartphones out there.Ĭan you explain why you think the iPhone 4 is the best smartphone out there?Ĭurrently, the best combination looks like Android OS phone + iPod Touch. "Like I said, the iPhone 4 is still the best smartphone out there" - That is your opinion, and i frankly disagree. i'm talking about a user experience as a smartphone, and the iPhone does not deliver, where as Android OS does. The Thunderbolt is outselling the iPhone 4 on Verizon: īut i could care less what outsells. But if you want to talk about outselling. I seem to be a spec whore? That's a degrading word, do you rinse your dirty mouth? or I guess your vocabulary is too limited to use other words?īut no i'm not "spec-centralized", i'm not talking about outselling. The thunderbolt doesn't even come close to outselling the iPhone just on Verizon. Like I said,t he iPhone 4 is stil the best smartphone out there.
People keep wanting to point to these android spec whore of the month models, but they don't offer a superior experience. If those are the best phones in the market why do multiple iPhone and Blackberry devices outsell the best android phone ALWAYS? but seeing as how macbooks and macbook pros are just coming out of their hardware glitches, i think its better to iron out those issues before stuffing new chips into them. The Mac Pro will obviously be the most likely to see great benefits from it. At the very least, apple has already equipped some of their computers with 64-bit support where it would probably benefit the most. Dell's XPS is the only laptop line with C2D, which are generally more costly than the Macbook Pros, even the 17". Alienware has one that costs just about that much. I don't see too many laptops that are sub $1000 that offer Core 2 Duo at the moment. Now it's still priced as such, but times are moving, technology is advancing, and if you compare pound for pound, the MBP is behind.
Apart from 2'' thick behemoths, it was one of the fastest portables around, and it was priced accordingly. But now that direct hardware comparisons can be made, don't you think it's stupid that sub-$1000 PC notebooks have better processors than the best Apple has to offer?Īnd yes, the MBP is a top-of-the-line laptop. Maybe while Apple had PPC, you could have said that. I'm finding it hilarious that you can put yourself into Stevie's reality distortion field even after the Intel switch.
0 kommentar(er)
